| Home / Blog
Risk of Climate Change and US Industry Insurance Regulation

Risk of Climate Change and US Industry Insurance Regulation

Posted by-Lawerslog
Member Since-29 Dec 2015

In late November 2020, we printed a high-level overview of insurance regulatory improvements regarding climate change, accessible here. In the six months since regulators and industry participants on each side of the Atlantic Ocean have been maintaining the speed --and there'll be more to report early 2021.

This short update piece will concentrate on a December 16, 2020, Sustainable Finance Roundtable in the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), then on forthcoming comments (due on January 12, 2021) at the International Association of Insurance Supervisors' (IAIS)" program newspaper" about managing climate change risks. The DFS has also released some advice for business in the shape of FAQs and before Christmas submitted a"pre-proposed outreach" proposal for another amendment to New York's Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)/Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Legislation 203 (comments due January 8, 2021). Ultimately, additionally pre-Christmas, the business itself, especially the Lloyd's Market, weighed in using climate change-related aims to decrease and phase out finance and investments in coal-related companies.


EIOPA Sustainable Finance Roundtable

From the words of its director, Gabriel Bernardino, EIOPA is starting to go from"coverage to practice" about climate change dangers. Throughout the Roundtable, a number of the segments contained a discussion of metrics that regulators may use to evaluate re/insurer progress in integrating environmental sustainability issues into investing and underwriting...and to funding requirements. EIOPA is suggesting two new key performance indicators: I) on the other hand, the percentage of resources that finance or are correlated with environmentally sustainable economic activities; and ii) on the financial side, the percentage of the gross written premium from insuring activities/exposures which are environmentally sustainable. EIOPA appears decided to advance the climate shift chunk concerning natural disaster modeling ("nat cat modeling") too, serving note that future versions will have to incorporate new countries inside the European Union, fresh perils (e.g., wildfire and drought in addition to flooding, quake, etc.) and fresh lines of business...and ought to consist of loading variables to account for raising climate change threat. All this original work will have to be reassessed and recalibrated frequently to incorporate new science and changes in vulnerability in addition to new insurance solutions. Opinions on EIOPA's frame proposals are expected at varying times within the initial two weeks of 2021.

Expect to see comparable increasing communication and communication in the USA, even though the sheer quantity of our national and state banks, securities/commodities insurance, and trading labs may impede such attempts. One thing to watch for on any occasion.

IAIS Program Paper

As mentioned in our November 23, 2020, report, the IAIS' Program Paper on tackling climate threat is at a public consultation period. The reach of the program paper incorporates several regulatory compliance facets --including supervisory inspection and reporting, corporate governance, risk management, investments, and financial disclosures--however doesn't tackle issues like asset valuation and funding requirements, the conduct of the business, or macroprudential oversight. We'll report further as this newspaper is finalized.


New York financial authorities (it is worth recalling that the DFS governs both insurance companies and state-chartered banks also has lately made it crystal clear that the DFS' concentrate on climate change regulatory problems applies to both industries ) will continue to sponsor a set of short climate shift"knowledge exchange" sessions using a mixture of speakers, not only labs. As mentioned above and as declared in the DFS September 22, 2020, Circular Letter No. 15 on Climate Change and Insurance Industry, there was an understanding exchange session in early December, and a second is scheduled for January 15. 


Following is a brief overview of FAQs of most interest:

  • Circular Letter No. 15 applies to both national (New York-domiciled) and foreign-authorized (domiciled in another US state) carriers, however, the DFS admits its"supervision over national and licensed insurance companies, however, isn't equal" (somewhat laborious!)
  • No new regulations concerning"climate-related supervisory activities" are considered (but using the regulatory actions"Timeline" quoted below AND the"pre-proposed outreach" proposal under )
  • As to pressure testing, the DFS has been"grow its strategy"
  • No"formal anticipation" to add climate factors in ORSAs (but with a "pre-proposed outreach" proposal under )

Due to financial disclosures, the DFS will continue to appraise Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) (or equal ) disclosures regarding"governance, strategy, metrics, and risks" but bearing in mind"proportionality and materiality" factors as insurance companies aren't all vulnerable to climate change dangers to the identical level

Timeline for potential DFS actions?" Even though the deadline is still being finalized, DFS intends to:

Establish the worldwide knowledge exchange conference series on climate change at the end of 2020, together with sessions scheduled to occur during the first quarter of 2021;

Issue suggested detailed advice on insurers' strategies to handling the financial risks from climate change in the first quarter of 2021 and supply 90 days for public comment;

Organize an industry roundtable to collect feedback on the proposed advice and, after integrating the comments, issue the comprehensive advice in the next quarter of 2021; and

Examine the financial risk exposure to New York domestic carriers' resources from climate change.

As mentioned in the Circular Letter [No. 15, issued September 22, 2020], queries regarding an insurer's strategy and actions regarding the monetary risks from climate change are going to be incorporated into DFS's evaluation procedure starting in 2021. To get ready for these examinations, insurers will begin receiving information requests associated with the climate in their very first Day Letters in December 2020."

Pre-Proposed Outreach

It looks like the FAQs'"no proper anticipation" rhetoric noted immediately above has been altered throughout December (possibly affected by the EIOPA Sustainable Finance Forum on December 16?) As the DFS printed a"pre-proposed outreach" proposition to amend the country's enterprise threat management/own hazard solvency assessment Regulation 203 to especially contain"climate change" (along with cybersecurity, epidemics, and pandemics!) One of the"reasonably predictable and appropriate material dangers" (heretofore restricted to"finance, asset-liability fitting, credit, market, operational, reputational, and liquidity") that national New York insurers (again, only those domiciled in the country --such as branches of past-due insurers) are expected to include within their yearly ERM/ORSA filings.

 While direction at any group which includes a New York domestic agency ought to be paying careful attention to this evolving DFS climate change regulatory framework and strategies for Additional advancement in 2021, It's encouraging to think about the DFS' recognition that one size Doesn't fit all:

"...each insurer must have a standardized approach which reflects its exposure to the financial risks from climate change and the character, scale, and complexity of its organization. DFS comprehends that climate change impacts each insurer in various ways and to various degrees based on the insurer's size, complexity, geographical distribution, company lines, investment plans, along other aspects. DFS enjoys that insurance companies don't have the same amount of funds to handle such risks and are at various points in the process of integrating these risks in their governance, strategy, and risk management."

Lloyd's Climate Change Goals 

Before Christmas,'' declared a ton of climate change/ESG (ecological, social and corporate governance) objectives from the Market's earliest ESG Report, focusing on diminishing participation with firms participated in sustainable irrigation extraction and usage, oil plantations mining/extraction and Arctic energy extraction actions, such as:

  • No more underwriting new dangers in those businesses, beginning January 1, 2022, and phasing out finance any firm that derives 30 percent or more of its earnings from activities in those businesses entirely by 2030
  • No fresh investments in businesses in those businesses by 2022 and phasing out investments in any business that participates 30 percent or more of its earnings from activities in those sectors, with finishing dates beginning as early as January 1, 2026
  • Committing 5 percent of Central Fund investments to ESG" effect" investments
  • Committing 2 percent of the Marketplace's Yearly premium to insure "sustainable and innovative" activities/products
  • Committing the Corporation of Lloyd's to become carbon neutral by 2025

While isn't the first insurer to declare climate change objectives and obligations and while some policymakers and authorities will welcome reports such as the Lloyd's ESG Report, US carriers should anticipate that some national regulators, especially New York, look very determined to induce climate risk management developments in"governance, strategy and risk management" for all those insurance companies with higher rates of the climate threat. Policymakers and regulators in different jurisdictions, e.g., in Alberta or Louisiana and Texas, might have additional perspectives on investment and underwriting cutbacks targeting low-income energy businesses.